|
November 03, 2003More on Amazon's Search Inside the BookWIRED News is reporting that Amazon.com's "Search Inside the Book" service does not allow users to "print pages from within books."Technically, it appears what Amazon has done is fool browsers into not showing the scanned image of a book page when you try to print from your browser. For instance, when using Safari on MacOS X or Microsoft's Internet Explorer in Windows, if you try to print a "Search Inside the Book" search result page, you get everything from the Amazon web page except the scanned image from the book itself. Interestingly, Amazon has added a noRightClick() JavaScript function on these pages, so you can't Right-Click on a page image and save the image to disk, something that was doable ten days ago when I first wrote about Amazon's new search service in Nettle here (I guess someone at Amazon was paying attention!).
Of course, the NoRightClick thingie can be defeated by simply disabling JavaScript (at least using Safari). The RightClick menu works with JavaScript disabled, and you're able to save the image to disk or view in a new window. And if you open the image in a new window, you can then print it no problem.
Posted by brian at November 3, 2003 03:16 PM
| TrackBack
Comments
They also add 96 carriage returns at the top of the source to make it appear that you can't see it if you do "view source". It's a stupid browser trick, which smells just a little... Posted by: noname at December 2, 2003 02:40 PMYou can also just make a screen shot and crop it for the book image. I did this last week so I could print a picture to give to the friend for whom I had just purchased the book on Amazon. Posted by: Ruby at December 4, 2003 10:20 AMAs of today and since who knows when, I see Amazon wants a credit card number to view the "copyrighted material." I tried feeding it a couple of validly formatted dummy numbers, but no dice. Well, I can go to my local library and view the entire book free if I really want to.... Posted by: Tim Peltan at June 28, 2004 04:31 PMPost a comment
|